1
00:00:07,539 --> 00:00:10,196
The starting point in science is observation

2
00:00:10,196 --> 00:00:12,430
What you are seeing here

3
00:00:12,430 --> 00:00:15,622
is what happened to the North Tower of the World Trade Center

4
00:00:15,622 --> 00:00:19,989
the second of three buildings to “collapse” on 9/11/2001

5
00:00:19,989 --> 00:00:22,008
I used the word “collapse”

6
00:00:22,008 --> 00:00:23,558
but words can be deceptive

7
00:00:23,558 --> 00:00:26,421
What do you really see happening here?

8
00:00:26,421 --> 00:00:29,444
There is a tremendous amount of falling debris

9
00:00:29,444 --> 00:00:31,756
but under the canopy of debris

10
00:00:31,756 --> 00:00:36,775
you see the rapid sequence of explosive ejections of material

11
00:00:36,775 --> 00:00:39,965
Some of the jets have been clocked at over 100 miles per hour

12
00:00:39,965 --> 00:00:43,256
I will call them explosions because it's hard to find

13
00:00:43,256 --> 00:00:45,913
other words that describe what we are seeing here

14
00:00:45,913 --> 00:00:48,722
The explosions are not isolated and few

15
00:00:48,722 --> 00:00:51,129
They are continuous and widespread

16
00:00:51,129 --> 00:00:53,980
They move progressively down the faces of the building

17
00:00:53,980 --> 00:00:56,577
nearly keeping pace with the falling debris

18
00:00:56,577 --> 00:01:00,704
Perhaps you can imagine a natural cause, but I can't

19
00:01:00,704 --> 00:01:05,501
Notice that the explosions are occurring on multiple floors at once

20
00:01:05,501 --> 00:01:06,850
over a wide zone

21
00:01:06,850 --> 00:01:09,702
not in a floor-by-floor sequence that might be explained

22
00:01:09,702 --> 00:01:11,096
by a pancaking collapse

23
00:01:11,096 --> 00:01:15,594
Notice that there are explosions far below the point of collapse

24
00:01:15,594 --> 00:01:17,810
Some are isolated and focused

25
00:01:17,810 --> 00:01:20,408
These are often referred to as “squibs”

26
00:01:20,408 --> 00:01:22,647
and are commonly seen in controlled demolitions

27
00:01:22,647 --> 00:01:26,626
However this is not a standard controlled demolition

28
00:01:26,626 --> 00:01:29,216
The building is being progressively destroyed

29
00:01:29,216 --> 00:01:31,603
from the top down by waves of explosions

30
00:01:31,603 --> 00:01:33,598
creating a huge debris field

31
00:01:33,598 --> 00:01:36,317
The destruction occurred in multiple waves...

32
00:01:36,317 --> 00:01:37,936
not just in one wave

33
00:01:37,936 --> 00:01:40,485
Most obvious is a rapid sequence

34
00:01:40,485 --> 00:01:43,108
of explosions near the visible corner of the building

35
00:01:43,108 --> 00:01:45,892
but simultaneously we can see another wave

36
00:01:45,892 --> 00:01:48,459
of explosions much further down the face of the building

37
00:01:48,459 --> 00:01:50,163
under the canopy of falling debris

38
00:01:50,163 --> 00:01:55,099
Notice the both waves of explosions progressing down the face of the building,

39
00:01:55,099 --> 00:01:58,412
nearly keeping pace with a falling debris, just a few feet away

40
00:01:58,412 --> 00:02:03,287
Slabs of concrete did not fall to the ground and smash to dust

41
00:02:03,287 --> 00:02:06,241
There is almost no concrete in the rubble pile

42
00:02:06,241 --> 00:02:10,489
Notice the concrete is being forcefully ejected outward

43
00:02:10,489 --> 00:02:13,349
from the sides of the building already pulverized to dust

44
00:02:13,349 --> 00:02:18,689
Notice that embedded in the dust clouds are huge girders and entire sections

45
00:02:18,689 --> 00:02:21,546
of steel framing that are being hurled out of the building

46
00:02:21,546 --> 00:02:26,686
The horizontal speed of some of the girders has been measured at over 70 miles per hour

47
00:02:26,686 --> 00:02:31,053
Some of these girders impaled themselves in the sides of neighboring buildings

48
00:02:31,053 --> 00:02:34,895
Some landed as much as two football fields away from the base of the tower

49
00:02:34,895 --> 00:02:40,332
What could hurl heavy girders sideways with such force to give them such speed?

50
00:02:40,332 --> 00:02:43,682
Some people have suggested that the weight of the tower

51
00:02:43,682 --> 00:02:45,977
crushing down on the girders caused them to flex

52
00:02:45,977 --> 00:02:49,091
then they jumped out sideways by spring action

53
00:02:49,091 --> 00:02:52,255
But we are not seeing isolated jumping girders

54
00:02:52,255 --> 00:02:55,699
We are seeing a major fraction of the mass of the building

55
00:02:55,699 --> 00:02:59,937
steel, concrete, office furniture, and the remains of the human occupants

56
00:02:59,937 --> 00:03:02,450
reduced to small pieces of rubble

57
00:03:02,450 --> 00:03:06,060
and fine dust and being explosively ejected in all directions

58
00:03:06,060 --> 00:03:10,149
Bone fragments were found on the roofs of adjacent buildings

59
00:03:10,149 --> 00:03:12,975
The bones were not crushed in the falling mass

60
00:03:12,975 --> 00:03:15,296
or they would have been trapped in the debris pile

61
00:03:15,296 --> 00:03:18,151
They were pulverized along with everything else

62
00:03:18,151 --> 00:03:19,746
and blown out in all directions

63
00:03:19,746 --> 00:03:24,396
The NIST investigators have claimed that the top section of the building

64
00:03:24,396 --> 00:03:26,164
above the plane impact point

65
00:03:26,164 --> 00:03:30,127
came down like a pile driver crushing the undamaged lower section

66
00:03:30,127 --> 00:03:31,828
of the building all the way to the ground

67
00:03:31,828 --> 00:03:36,347
the top section of the building is however noticeably absent

68
00:03:36,347 --> 00:03:40,568
There is NOTHING above the ring of explosions except for a fountain of debris.

69
00:03:40,568 --> 00:03:42,474
Can you see a pile driver?

70
00:03:42,474 --> 00:03:46,304
It does not appear that the building is being crushed by anything

71
00:03:46,304 --> 00:03:51,461
The waves of destruction and explosive ejections of material are occurring

72
00:03:51,461 --> 00:03:56,293
over a wide zone that continues all the way to the top of what remains of the building

73
00:03:56,293 --> 00:04:00,676
The scientists at NIST did not model the collapse of the towers

74
00:04:00,676 --> 00:04:04,115
Their analysis was gravely flawed in many ways

75
00:04:04,115 --> 00:04:09,075
but the biggest flaw was that the scope of their investigation was artificially limited

76
00:04:09,075 --> 00:04:13,347
They took their analysis only to the point of “initiation” of collapse

77
00:04:13,347 --> 00:04:17,371
as though all that followed was inevitable and needed no explanation

78
00:04:17,371 --> 00:04:22,359
The scope of their investigation was limited to what might have happened

79
00:04:22,359 --> 00:04:24,882
or what could have happened to BEGIN the collapse

80
00:04:24,882 --> 00:04:29,367
What they explicitly did not take into account is what actually happened

81
00:04:29,367 --> 00:04:33,622
By limiting their investigation to the natural precursors of collapse

82
00:04:33,622 --> 00:04:35,617
(plane damage and fire)

83
00:04:35,617 --> 00:04:37,720
they ruled out, from the start,

84
00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:41,311
any possibility of uncovering evidence of planned demolition

85
00:04:41,311 --> 00:04:44,880
In other words, anything that occurred during the collapse itself

86
00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:47,097
such as the evidence you are seeing here

87
00:04:47,097 --> 00:04:50,572
was explicitly scripted out of the investigation

88
00:04:50,572 --> 00:04:53,761
Any analytical model of the collapse

89
00:04:53,761 --> 00:04:56,358
no matter how simple or how sophisticated,

90
00:04:56,358 --> 00:04:58,783
is a bad model and bad science

91
00:04:58,783 --> 00:05:01,076
if it does not come back full circle

92
00:05:01,076 --> 00:05:03,528
to explain the actual observations

93
00:05:03,528 --> 00:05:11,504
Ask yourself...What do you see?